Seth Jarad Johnston v. Kentucky Bar Association
Seth Jarad Johnston v. Kentucky Bar Association
Opinion
Suyrrtur &Turf Tfir 2014-SC-000288-KB
SETH JARAD JOHNSTON DAT ES -3 -14EA..A.C.I.cow MOVANT
V IN SUPREME COURT
KENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION RESPONDENT
OPINION AND ORDER Movant, Seth Jarad Johnston, KBA No. 91030, 1 petitions this Court to resign under the terms of permanent disbarment. The Kentucky Bar Association (KBA) has no objection to Johnston's motion. Movant was temporarily suspended pursuant to SCR 3.166(1) 2 on October 31, 2013.
II. KBA FILE 21299 KBA File 21299 relates to Count 1 and Count 3 of the information. charges. Count I charged that Movant committed mail fraud in connection with a lawsuit brought in the wake of the well-known, and notorious, Fen-phen litigation to recover funds wrongfully diverted from the Fen-phen plaintiffs.
Movant devised a scheme to divert to his own personal accounts, $14,963.05 that his firm collected for the Fen-phen clients.
Count III of the information charged Movant with committing wire fraud by devising a scheme by which he fraudulently gained access under false pretenses to a bank account of his associate, Angela Ford, and stole money from her. Movant used that money to cover amounts he had stolen from Clients, and which he had diverted to his personal use, including his role in a conspiracy to illegally distribute synthetic marijuana as set out in Count 5.
Movant acknowledges that the foregoing facts would support disciplinary charges for violations of SCR 3.130-8.4(b) (criminal act reflecting adversely on lawyer's honesty, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer in other respects) and SCR 3.130-8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation).
III. KBA FILE 21600 KBA File 21299 relates to Counts 2, 4, 5, and 6 of the information.
Count 2 alleged that Movant had committed mail fraud in connection with his representation of the Estate of Cecil Rowlett. Movant defrauded the residual heirs of the estate by hiding estate assets and diverting to his own benefit, and to the benefit of the executor of the estate, Brett Rowlett. In furtherance of his scheme, Movant misrepresented the value of the cash assets of the estate to the Harlan District Court, and then diverted the unreported amounts for his own benefit and for the benefit of the executor of the estate, Brett Rowlett, and that the scheme involved the use of the U.S. Postal Service.
Count 4 of the information charged Movant with obstruction of justice in connection with his efforts to influence a witness, Stacey Birden, to destroy or conceal documents with the intent to impair their availability for use in the federal grand jury's investigation of Movant.
Count 5 of the information charged Movant with conspiracy to import synthetic marijuana into Fayette County for distribution and sale in his co- conspirators' various convenience stores. Appellant admits that he participated in this conspiracy by transferring $100,000.00 to his co- conspirators to finance the illegal scheme.
Count 6 of the information charged Movant with tax fraud for underreporting his taxable income for the 2011 tax year. Movant admits that he filed a false tax return reflecting $26,372.00 in taxable income when his actual taxable income for that year was 208,950.00; Movant further admits that this failure to report his entire amount of income was done knowingly and willfully and that over $10,000.00 of the money he obtained in calendar year 2011 was from criminal activity.
Movant acknowledges that the facts of these counts would support disciplinary charges for violations of SCR 3.130-3.3(a)(1) (false statement of material fact to tribunal); SCR 3.130-8.4(b) (criminal act reflecting adversely on lawyer's honesty, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer in other respects); and SCR 3.130-8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation).
IV. DISCIPLINE Movant admits that his actions violated the above referenced Rules of Professional Conduct. Therefore, he requests that the Court grant him leave to resign from the KBA under terms of permanent disbarment pursuant to SCR 3.480(3). 3 We agree that Movant's motion to withdraw his membership is appropriate pursuant to SCR 3.480(3). Therefore, it is hereby ORDERED that:
All sitting. All concur.
ENTERED: August 21, 2014.
Any member who has been engaged in unethical or unprofessional conduct and desires to withdraw his membership under terms of permanent disbarment shall file a verified motion with the Court stating as follows: (a) He/she has violated the Rules of Professional Conduct, or his/her conduct fails to comply with those rules, the specifics of which shall be detailed in the motion.
(b) He/she will not seek reinstatement and understands the provisions of SCR 3.510 and SCR 3.520 do not apply.
(c) He/she will not practice law in the Commonwealth of Kentucky subsequent to the permanent disbarment order.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.