Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /Louisiana /Cases /Louisiana Court of Appeal /

1909

135 Louisiana Court of Appeal opinions from 1909.

  • Lindner v. Stock 7 Teiss. 31, (La. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Alba v. Zeller 7 Teiss. 47, (La. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Hoffman v. Allnet 7 Teiss. 54, (La. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Weiler v. Postal Telegraph Cable Co. 7 Teiss. 55, (La. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Diboll, Owen & Goldstein, Ltd. v. Grunewald 7 Teiss. 59, (La. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Roche v. Hotel Grunewald Co. 7 Teiss. 65, (La. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Strauss v. Pullman Palace Car Co. 7 Teiss. 67, (La. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Davies v. Rascon Manufacturing & Development Co. 7 Teiss. 73, (La. Ct. App. 1909)
  • State v. Bush 7 Teiss. 91, (La. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Burk v. Burk 7 Teiss. 92, (La. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Causey v. A. B. French's Son & Co. 7 Teiss. 95, (La. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Sanders Baptist Church v. Dennis 7 Teiss. 406, (La. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Abraham v. Alexander 7 Teiss. 6, (La. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Ferguson v. McGilvray Plumbing Co. 7 Teiss. 8, (La. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Crowley-Perrin Co. v. G. P. & L. J. Dobard & Purity Valley Wine & Liquor Cellar 7 Teiss. 12, (La. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Daniel v. Bailey 7 Teiss. 13, (La. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Demoruelle v. Laska 7 Teiss. 14, (La. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Bank of Pachuta v. Cranor Lumber Co. 7 Teiss. 17, (La. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Truxillo v. Texas & Pacific R. R. 7 Teiss. 18, (La. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Gunby v. Lesassier 7 Teiss. 27, (La. Ct. App. 1909)
  • De Poorter v. Haydel 7 Teiss. 107, (La. Ct. App. 1909)
  • S. Grabfelder & Co. v. Powers 7 Teiss. 270, (La. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Clemens v. Testard 6 Teiss. 177, (La. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Murray v. Le Blanc 6 Teiss. 387, (La. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Freed v. D'Orsay 6 Teiss. 388, (La. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Taggrat v. Hardy 6 Teiss. 391, (La. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Eggerson v. Ancar 6 Teiss. 417, (La. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Parish of Plaquemine, State ex rel. Wilkinson v. Hingle 6 Teiss. 380, (La. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Dinkelspiel v. Pons 6 Teiss. 383, (La. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Magavero ex rel. Magavero v. Centano 6 Teiss. 394, (La. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Pitre v. Texas & Pacific Railroad 6 Teiss. 364, (La. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Rapp v. Ernst 6 Teiss. 407, (La. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Nick v. Bensberg 6 Teiss. 408, (La. Ct. App. 1909)
  • McLellan v. Murray 6 Teiss. 385, (La. Ct. App. 1909)
  • State Realty Co. v. Bernard 6 Teiss. 387, (La. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Stafford v. Cranor Lumber Co. 6 Teiss. 392, (La. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Sims v. Orleans Tile Mnfg. Co. 6 Teiss. 393, (La. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Globe Realty Co. v. Cerdes 6 Teiss. 398, (La. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Howe v. Adam 6 Teiss. 400, (La. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Connell v. Pelican Cracker Co. 6 Teiss. 402, (La. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Thompson v. Copland 6 Teiss. 403, (La. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Morris McGraw Woodenware Co. v. German Fire Insurance 7 Teiss. 126, (La. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Brignac v. Bourgeois 6 Teiss. 384, (La. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Schaffer v. Lawton 6 Teiss. 366, (La. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Jarvis v. N. O. Live Stock Commission Co. 6 Teiss. 368, (La. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Bush v. Walmsley 6 Teiss. 368, (La. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Arbutnot, Latham & Co. v. Cage Drew Co. 6 Teiss. 374, (La. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Hinrerer v. Haines 6 Teiss. 378, (La. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Pontchartrain Land Co. v. Conner 6 Teiss. 358, (La. Ct. App. 1909)
  • Colombel v. Housey 6 Teiss. 360, (La. Ct. App. 1909)
« Prev 1 2 3 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑