Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1909

N. O. Lighting Co. v. Leitz

N. O. Lighting Co. v. Leitz
Louisiana Court of Appeal · Decided February 8, 1909 · Dufour, Estopinal
6 Teiss. 143; 1909 La. App. LEXIS 48

N. O. Lighting Co. v. Leitz

Opinion of the Court

DUFOUR J.

The motion herein fails to comply with Rule 9, of this Court, in that it was not ‘ ‘ accompanied b.y three copies, of a written or printed brief which has been served upon the opposite counsel.”

Under the circumstances we shall not pass on it, in limns, but shall consider it when the cause is submitted on the merits.

The motion is denied without prejudice.

Opinion on the Merits

ON MERITS'.

ESTOPINAL, J.

The parties to this suit having entered' a written stipulation that the judgment of the District Court herein should be affirmed.

It is therefore now ordered, adjudged and decreed, that the judgment appealed from herein be, and the same is hereby,, affirmed, defendant and appellant to pay all costs.

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.