Kaul v. Hyland
Kaul v. Hyland
Opinion of the Court
His Honor,
rendered the opinion and decree of the Court as follows:
Plaintiff, a gardener and florist, appeals from a judgment on the merits dismissing his suit for the recovery of a balance of account for alleged services rendered and supplies furnished to defendant during a perior of about four years.
It is unnecessary to deal with this matter at great length. The only evidence tending at all to support the claim is the testimony of plaintiff himself which the trial Judge characterizes as “incredible.” And this estimate of it, though somewhat mildly expressed, is by no means erroneous; for aside from the proven unreliability of plaintiff’s testimony in general, the book which he files in connection therewith presents, at least one remarkable feature. He avers that it contains merely a copy of de
The judgment appealed from is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.