Leake v. Parson
Leake v. Parson
Opinion of the Court
Plaintiff alleges that he bought and defendant sold for ‘$100.00 wages earned by defendant and due him by his employer, the Illinois Central Railroad Company, amounting to $110.00. He sues for that amount, claiming that defendant collected the wages sold him without accounting to him therefor.
Defendant admits receiving $100.00 from plaintiff and the entire controversy is concerning the remainder of $10.00 claimed by defendant.
It is argued that the alleged sale of wages was in reality a loan at a usurious rate of interest. We find no support for this contention in the record. Moreover, the contract between the parties contains the following:
“This is an absolute and unconditional sale of said account and is not a loan or advance of money.”
It is admitted that at the time the $100.00 was paid, defendant there was due him as earned wages the sum of $110.00, hence Act 5 of 1906 prohibiting .the sale of unearned wages without the consent of the employer has no application. There is no
For the reasons assigned, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- P. E. LEAKE v. A. PARSON
- Cited By
- 309 cases
- Status
- Published