Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1925

Bell v. Delatte

Bell v. Delatte
Louisiana Court of Appeal · Decided May 9, 1925 · Carver, Odom
4 La. App. 83; 1925 La. App. LEXIS 659

Bell v. Delatte

Opinion of the Court

CARVER, J.

For the reasons given in the decision denying rehearing in the case of Monroe Hardware Company, Inc., vs. A. Delatte, et al. No. 2301 on the docket of this court, it is decreed that the rehearing asked for in this case be refused, with the modification that instead of plaintiff' in the call in warranty having the right to execute the judgment herein rendered on depositing $1,109.40, it is decreed that *84it shall have that right only on depositing $1,807.97; out of which deposit shall be paid, pro rata; the judgment in favor of the plaintiff in this suit and such judgments as may be or have been rendered in favor of the plaintiffs in the following suits on the docket of this court in which the warrantor herein has been called in warranty, namely:

No. 2301; Monroe Hardware Co. Inc. vs. A. Delatte, et al.

No. 2302; Parlor City Lumber Co. Inc. vs. A. Delatte, et al.

No. 2304; Monroe Hardware Co. Inc. vs. H. L. Thompson, et al.

The right is reéerved to defendant, Ouachita Valley Camp No. 10, Woodmen of the World, to apply for a rehearing.

The judgment herein rendered in favor of Ouachita Valley Camp No. 10, Woodmen of the World, against Union Indemnity Company, shall be credited with the share of the plaintiff herein of the deposit of $1,807.97.

Ouachita Valley Camp No. 10, Woodmen of the World, defendant shall pay the costs of this appeal; all other costs to be paid by the warrantor, Union Indemnity Company.

070rehearing

ON APPLICATION FOR REHEARING

For the reasons assigned in the opinion on the application for rehearing in the case of Monroe Hardware Company, Inc. vs. A. Delatte, et al. No. 2301 on the docket of this court, it is decreed:

First: That a rehearing is hereby granted to Ouachita Valley Camp No. 10, Woodmen of the World solely on the question whether it should deposit six hundred ninety eight and 57-100 dollars additional to the eleven hundred and nine and 40-100 dollars previously ordered deposited.

Second: That the rehearing hereby granted shall suspend execution of the judgment herein rendered in favor of the plaintiff against the Camp and in favor of the Camp against Union Indemnity Company only to the extent of a share of said six hundred ninety-eight and 57-100 dollars in proportion to plaintiff’s judgment herein and those rendered^ in favor of the plaintiffs in the following numbered and entitled cases on the docket of this court, to wit: No. 2301; Monroe Hardware Company, Inc. vs. A. Delatte, et al. No. 2302; Parlor City Lumber Co. Inc. vs. A. Delatte, et al. No. 2304; Monroe Hardware Co. Inc. vs. H. L. Thompson, et al.

Odom, Judge, recused.

070rehearing

ON REHEARING

For the reasons assigned in the opinionj on rehearing in the case of Monroe Hardware Company, Inc., versus A. Delatte, No. 2301 on the docket of this court:

It is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the original decree as modified on the application' of the Union Indemnity Com-j pany for a rehearing be amended as! follows: I

*85Instead of defendant, Ouachita Valley Camp No. 10, • Woodmen of the World, having the right to execute the judgment herein rendered against the warrantor on depositing $1109.40, it is decreed that it shall have the right only on depositing $1721.65. out of which deposit shall be paid, pro rata, the judgment in favor of the plaintiff in the following suits in which the warrantor herein has been called in warranty' (wherein judgments are rendered against it in favor of the Ouachita Valley Camp), namely:

No. 2301—Monroe Hardware Company, Inc., vs. A. Delatte, et al.

No. 2302—Parlor City Lumber Company, Inc., vs. A. Delatte, et al.

No. 2304—Monroe Hardware Co., Inc., Inc., vs. H. L. Thompson, et al.

And the decree, as thus amended, he and is made the judgment of this court.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.