Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1934

Leonard Stirling v. Industrial Lumber

Leonard Stirling v. Industrial Lumber
Louisiana Court of Appeal · Decided March 6, 1934 · PER CURIAM.
152 So. 917; 1934 La. App. LEXIS 547 (Southern Reporter)

Leonard Stirling v. Industrial Lumber

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

In this case, Industrial Lumber Company, Inc., has, by motion, called our attention to an error in which the judgment handed down herein on January 22, 1934, is inadvertently made to say in the last line of the decree: “Defendant, appellant is to pay the costs in both Courts,” when it was our intention to say that plaintiff, appellant, should bear the costs in both courts.

It is not necessary to grant a rehearing in order to make a correction of this kind.

. The decree is now corrected, and the word “plaintiff” is now substituted for the word “defendant” in the line and place mentioned.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.