Mix v. Royal Exchange Assur Co.
Mix v. Royal Exchange Assur Co.
Opinion of the Court
Plaintiff-appellant has filed his application for a rehearing, assigning several grounds of alleged error.
We need discuss but one of the grounds relied upon. Appellant calls attention- to our statement in the original opinion that Act No. 222 of 1928 was not in force because it had been repealed by Act No. 195 of 1948, LRA-RS 22:1 et seq. We overlooked the fact that the fire occurred on November 6, 1947, whilst the act of 1928 was in force. We have carefully read the
A rehearing is refused.
Rehearing refused.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.