Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1960

General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Rester

General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Rester
Louisiana Court of Appeal · Decided March 3, 1960 · Ellis, Frugé, Landry, Lottinger, Tate
118 So. 2d 515; 1960 La. App. LEXIS 920 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Rester

Opinion of the Court

TATE, Judge.

When this case was called for argument, neither appellant nor his counsel appeared, nor has a brief been filed in support of this appeal. Consequently, the appellant is presumed to have abandoned it. Brumfield v. Giles, 231 La. 84, 90 So.2d 786; Mitchell v. Martin, La.App. 1 Cir., 86 So.2d 211.

The appeal is dismissed.

070rehearing

On Application for Rehearing

PER CURIAM.

Counsel for the defendant-appellant has filed an application for rehearing alleging that his client did not intend to abandon the appeal, even though his attorney failed to show up for the oral argument and has neglected to file a brief. The reasons alleged for a rehearing are totally insufficient. Further from an excess of caution, we have read the record and find that the defense to this suit is completely without merit.

Rehearing refused.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.