Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1964

Connecticut Fire Insurance v. Kimbell Milling Co.

Connecticut Fire Insurance v. Kimbell Milling Co.
Louisiana Court of Appeal · Decided May 28, 1964 · Being, Culpep, Grant, Hood, Maintained, Motion, Refusal, Savoy, Should, Tate, That
164 So. 2d 642; 1964 La. App. LEXIS 1700 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Connecticut Fire Insurance v. Kimbell Milling Co.

Opinion of the Court

TATE, Judge.

This suit was consolidated for trial and appeal with the companion case of Simpson v. Kimbell Milling Co., 164 So.2d 637 (Docket No. 1138), rendered by us this same date. The present suit is a subrogation claim by the collision insurer of the vehicle driven by Simpson, plaintiff in the companion suit. The present plaintiff insurer’s right to recovery, and all issues of the trial and of the appeal, are identical with the issues in the companion Simpson suit. •

For the reasons stated in the companion appeal, the trial court’s judgment herein is amended so as to strike out the findings that the defendants were guilty of negligence and that the plaintiff’s assured was guilty of contributory negligence; as thus amended, the judgment is affirmed in all other respects. The plaintiff-appellee to pay all costs of this appeal.

Amended and affirmed.

070rehearing

On Application for Rehearing.

En Banc. Rehearing denied.

HOOD, J., dissents from refusal to grant rehearing, being of the opinion that the motion to dismiss should be maintained.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.