Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1964

Richard v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal · Decided September 15, 1964 · App, Culpep, Culpepper, Enterprises, From, Hood, Noted, Tate

167 So. 2d 840; 1964 La. App. LEXIS 1957 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

5 later published cases cite this decision.

Landreneau v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. (La. Ct. App. 1973)
Richard v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. (La. 1965)
Richard v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. (La. 1965)
Richard v. U. S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co. (La. 1965)
Richard v. Landreneau Enterprises (La. Ct. App. 1964)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

CULPEPPER, Judge.

For the reasons set forth in Richard v. Landreneau Enterprises, et al., La.App., 167 So.2d 827, in which a separate. opinion is rendered by us this date, the judgment appealed herein is reversed and set aside. It is now ordered, adjudged and decreed that there be judgment herein in favor of the defendant, United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, and against the plaintiff, rejecting his demands at his costs. All costs of this appeal are assessed against the plaintiff.

Reversed and rendered.

070rehearing

On Application for Rehearing.

En Banc. Rehearing denied.

TATE, J., dissents from denial of rehearing for reasons noted in Richard v. Landreneau Enterprises, La.App., 167 So. 2d 827.

Dissenting Opinion

TATE, Judge

(dissenting).

The writer dissents, for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion in Richard v. Landreneau Enterprises et al., La.App., 167 So.2d 827, rendered this same date.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.