Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1965

Ellis v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance

Ellis v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance
Louisiana Court of Appeal · Decided July 30, 1965 · Are, Culpep, Culpepper, Erugé, Frugé, Granted, Savoy, Should, Tate, That
177 So. 2d 603; 1965 La. App. LEXIS 3945 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Ellis v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance

Opinion of the Court

ERUGÉ, Judge.

This is a companion case with No. 1460, 177 So.2d 597, decided this date. For the reasons set forth therein, the judgment of the district court is affirmed. Plaintiffs are assessed costs of this appeal.

Affirmed.

CULPEPPER, J., concurs with written reasons.

TATE, J., dissents and assigns written reasons.

Concurring Opinion

CULPEPPER, Judge

(concurring).

The writer respectfully concurs for the reasons assigned in the companion suit decided this date, Brown v. Southern Farm Bureau Cas. Ins. Co., 177 So.2d 597 (Docket No. 1460).

On Application for Rehearing.

En Banc. Rehearing denied.

TATE and SAVOY, JJ., are of the opinion that a rehearing should be granted.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.