Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1968

Menard v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Menard v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
Louisiana Court of Appeal · Decided June 18, 1968 · Are, Culpep, Culpepper, Forth, Frugé, Granted, Hood, Original, Savoy, Should
212 So. 2d 141; 1968 La. App. LEXIS 4850 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Menard v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Opinion of the Court

SAVOY, Judge.

For the reasons assigned in the companion case of Ardoin v. Menard et al. (La.App., 3 Cir., 1968), 212 So.2d 135, decided this date, the judgment appealed from herein is affirmed at appellants’ costs.

Affirmed.

CULPEPPER, J., dissents and assigns written reasons. See La.App., 212 So.2d 135.

070rehearing

On Application for Rehearing.

En Banc. Rehearing denied.

CULPEPPER and FRUGÉ, JJ., are of the opinion a rehearing should be granted for the reasons set forth in Culpepper’s dissent to the original decision.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.