Menard v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
Menard v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
212 So. 2d 141; 1968 La. App. LEXIS 4773
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Menard v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
Opinion of the Court
For the reasons assigned in the companion case of Ardoin v. Menard et al. (La. App., 3 Cir., 1968), 212 So.2d 135, decided this date, the judgment appealed from herein is affirmed at appellants’ costs.
Affirmed.
CULPEPPER, J., dissents and assigns written reasons. See La.App., 212 So. 2d 135.
070rehearing
On Application for Rehearing.
En Banc. Rehearing denied.
CULPEPPER and FRUGE, JJ., are of the opinion a rehearing should be granted for the reasons set forth in Culpepper’s dissent to the original decision.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.