Insured Lloyds v. Ranger County Mutual Insurance
Insured Lloyds v. Ranger County Mutual Insurance
212 So. 2d 255; 1968 La. App. LEXIS 4756
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Insured Lloyds v. Ranger County Mutual Insurance
Opinion of the Court
For the reasons given in Wallace M. Dahlquist v. Canal Insurance Company, Clifton Auzenne, Clarence Batiste, Ranger County Mutual Insurance Company and Melvin Steely, 212 So.2d 246 (La.App.3d Cir., 1968), No. 2307 on our docket, consolidated herewith for trial purposes, the judgment of the trial court in this case is affirmed at appellants’ costs.
Affirmed.
HOOD, J., concurs for the reasons assigned in his dissenting opinion in Dahlquist v. Canal Insurance Co., 212 So.2d 246.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.