Cleveland v. Bordelon
Cleveland v. Bordelon
293 So. 2d 574; 1974 La. App. LEXIS 4639
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Cleveland v. Bordelon
Opinion of the Court
This matter is consolidated with the suit of Robert Gene Mickel v. The Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, et al. (No. 4469), 293 So.2d 574, and the suit of Ronald D. Shaw v. The Travelers Insurance Company, et al. (No. 4470), 293 So.2d 568, decided this day.
For the reasons assigned in the opinion entitled Ronald D. Shaw v. The Travelers Insurance Company, et al. (No. 4470), the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Costs of this appeal are assessed against the defendants-appellants.
Affirmed.
Dissenting Opinion
dissents and assigns written reasons in 4470 and voted for rehearing on behalf of defendants-appellants.
DOMENGEAUX, J., concurs in decree.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.