Mickel v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
Mickel v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
Opinion of the Court
This suit is consolidated with the suit of Lula Mae Harrell Cleveland, Individually and for the minors, Laverne Cleveland and Henry Cleveland v. Stanley B. Bordelon (No. 4468), 293 So.2d 574, and the suit of Ronald D. Shaw v. The Travelers Insur
For the reasons assigned in the case of Ronald D. Shaw v. The Travelers Insurance Company, et al. (No. 4470), the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Costs of this appeal are assessed against the defendants-appellants.
Affirmed.
Dissenting Opinion
dissents and assigns written reasons in 4470 and voted for rehearing on behalf of defendants-appellants.
DOMENGEAUX, J., concurs in decree.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.