Plaintiffs’ nearly 14-year-old child consented to be shot with a BB gun by engaging in a “war” with defendants’ eight-year-old son. Perhaps defendants might be liable to a noncombatant stranger shot by their eight-year-old son during the “war” with BB guns defendants allowed on their premises, but they are not liable to a teenager who conducts the two-party battle with defendants’ eight-year-old son.

Affirmed.