Smith v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal
Smith v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 416 So. 2d 381 (1982)
Cet, Dou, Doucet, Guidry, Stoker

Smith v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

Opinion of the Court

DOUCET, Judge.

WRIT GRANTED AND MADE PEREMPTORY. For the reasons in Number 82-^275: Daniel Patrick Briggs v. United Services Automobile Association, 416 So.2d 377, it is hereby ordered, that applicant’s cost paid under protest in the sum of $250.00, be refunded and the Local Rule XIII(D) of the Ninth Judicial District Court, as amended, is herein found to be invalid and unenforceable as being contrary to LSA-R.S. 13:3050.

Reference

Full Case Name
Bobbie J. SMITH, Plaintiff-Respondent v. GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, INC., Defendant-Applicant-Respondent
Cited By
3 cases
Status
Published