Smith v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
Smith v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
416 So. 2d 381
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision.
- Briggs v. UNITED SERVICES AUTO. ASS'N (La. Ct. App. 1982)
- Briggs v. United Services Automobile Ass'n (La. Ct. App. 1982)
- Briggs v. United Services Automobile Ass'n (La. 1982)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
WRIT GRANTED AND MADE PEREMPTORY. For the reasons in Number 82-^275: Daniel Patrick Briggs v. United Services Automobile Association, 416 So.2d 377, it is hereby ordered, that applicant’s cost paid under protest in the sum of $250.00, be refunded and the Local Rule XIII(D) of the Ninth Judicial District Court, as amended, is herein found to be invalid and unenforceable as being contrary to LSA-R.S. 13:3050.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.