State v. Leitch
State v. Leitch
Opinion of the Court
ORDER TO DISMISS
On June 27,1983 the Trial Judge granted the State until July 8 to file this writ application. On July 13 the State orally moved and was granted an extension.
Although the trial court may grant an extension under Rule 4-3, it may not do so after the original time for applying has expired. See State v. Sutton, 374 So.2d 1218 (La. 1979); State v. Mandino, 352 So.2d 233 (La. 1977).
Further, we find relator’s application is without merit but we dismiss for the foregoing reason.
THEREFORE, this writ application is dismissed.
Dissenting Opinion
dissenting:
In my regard, there was indeed probable cause to arrest Leitch. Relator's application was meritorious in that the extension of time, within which to file the application, did not exceed the judge’s discretion.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- STATE of Louisiana v. Peter LEITCH
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published