State v. Foy
State v. Foy
Concurring Opinion
concurring.
I agree completely with the majority opinion. I file this special concurring opinion, however, feeling that the Louisiana Constitution does not provide for nor mandate judicial review of sentences which fall within the limits set by the respective criminal statutes. See my concurring opinions in State v. Goodman, 427 So.2d 529 (La.App. 3rd Cir. 1983); State v. Vallare, 430 So.2d 1336 (La.App. 3rd Cir. 1983), writ denied (La. 1983); State v. Shelby, Jr., 438 So.2d 1166 (La.App. 3rd Cir. 1983), handed down this date.
Opinion of the Court
For the reasons assigned in State of Louisiana v. Brown, 438 So.2d 1202 (La.App. 3 Cir. 1983) (rendered this date), defendant’s sentence and conviction are affirmed.
AFFIRMED.
DOMENGEAUX, J., concurs and files brief reason.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- STATE of Louisiana v. Charles Wayne FOY
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published