Crosby v. Crosby

Louisiana Court of Appeal
Crosby v. Crosby, 442 So. 2d 1248 (1983)
1983 La. App. LEXIS 9938
Bowes, Du, Fresne, Gaudin

Crosby v. Crosby

070rehearing

*1249ON APPLICATION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

Our original opinion is reported at 434 So.2d 162. Subsequently, we granted a rehearing and heard oral arguments.

While the merits of the rehearing were under advisement, the following joint motion was filed by the parties:

β€œIt is stipulated by and between the plaintiff and defendant that this suit has been compromised and settled and the parties move it be dismissed with prejudice, each party to pay its own respective costs.”

Accordingly, a ruling on the rehearing is moot and will not be forthcoming.

Reference

Full Case Name
Vinton J. CROSBY v. Lois Pitre CROSBY
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published