State v. Champagne
State v. Champagne
Opinion of the Court
The defendant, Nathan Champagne, pleaded guilty to the charge of attempted
The defendant filed no assignments of error pursuant to LSA-C.Cr.P. Art. 844. Therefore, the scope of appellate review in this case is limited to a review of the pleadings and proceedings, without inspection of the evidence, for errors patent. LSA-C. Cr.P. Art. 920; State v. Zeno, 322 So.2d 136 (La. 1975). We have carefully examined the record in this case pursuant to the mandate of LSA-C.Cr.P. Art. 920, and finding no errors patent on the face of the record, we affirm the defendant’s conviction and the sentence imposed.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.