State v. Young
State v. Young
Opinion of the Court
On December 20, 1985, the appellant was charged with distributing a substance falsely represented to be cocaine. He was arraigned on January 7, 1986, and pled not guilty. On February 13th a six-member jury found him guilty of attempted distribution of a substance falsely represented to be cocaine. His motion for post judgment verdict of acquittal was denied on February 20th. He waived all delays and was sentenced as a multiple offender to serve two years at hard labor. His motion for appeal was filed on February 28th.
By his sole assignment of error, the appellant requests a review of the record for errors patent. We have reviewed the record and our review reveals there are no errors patent.
Accordingly, appellant’s conviction and sentence are hereby affirmed.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.