ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT

This matter comes before us on remand from the Supreme Court1 wherein our opinion was vacated and set aside because “[i]t appears that the remand ordered by the court of appeal would result in a reduction of plaintiffs award. This would be improper. Defendants did not appeal or answer the appeal ...”

Since a computation made as directed by our opinion, 591 So.2d 1240, would result in a reduction of benefits to plaintiff and the judgment is definitive against defendants, a remand would serve no purpose. Thus, the award for past due supplemental earnings benefits of $12,781.71 and the finding that plaintiffs average monthly wage at the time of the accident was $1,105.44 are affirmed. The denial of plaintiffs request for penalties and attorneys fees is also affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

ON REHEARING

While considering the rehearing request, we noted a typographical error in our opinion dated June 23, 1992, in affirming the trial court’s award to plaintiff of past due supplemental earnings benefits of $12,-781.71 rather than the correct amount of $2,781.71. Hence, our opinion is corrected to read $2,781.71. The application for rehearing is denied.