State v. Byrd
State v. Byrd
Opinion of the Court
A bonding company has appealed a trial court judgment dated July 14, 1992, which denied its motion to have set aside a judgment of bond forfeiture dated August 27, 1991. The bonding company’s motion was filed on March 2, 1992.
The record reveals that the trial court ordered the bond forfeited on August 27,1991, and that written notice to the surety was issued that date by the Clerk of Court for the 19th Judicial District Court. The notice triggered the running of a 60-day time period for opposing the forfeiture or for filing an appeal. LSA-R.S. 15:8s.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal at appellant’s costs.
DISMISSED.
. LSA-R.S. 15:85 provides in pertinent part:
A. All bonds taken to secure the appearance of any person before any district court executed by a surety company authorized to do business in the state of Louisiana or an agent of such a company, except at a preliminary examination, shall be forfeited and collected as follows:
(2)(a) If within twenty-four hours after the rendition, under the provisions of this Section, of any judgment forfeiting any appearance bond, the judgment has not been paid, the district attorney shall cause the judgment to be recorded.... If the judgment has not been paid within six months of mailing of proper notice hereunder, the district attorney shall cause to issue a fieri facias against both the principal and his sureties. A sixty-day period from mailing of proper notice herein constitutes an appeal delay and failure to assert a defense to the forfeiture and collection of the bond within this period waives any defense to the forfeiture and collection of the bond as set forth in this Section. (Emphasis supplied.)
Reference
- Full Case Name
- STATE of Louisiana v. Isaac BYRD
- Cited By
- 4 cases
- Status
- Published