State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Grimm
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Grimm
630 So. 2d 970; 92 La.App. 3 Cir. 1275; 1994 La. App. LEXIS 3; 1994 WL 14485
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Grimm
Opinion of the Court
For the reasons expressed in Ourso v. Grimm, 630 So.2d 963 (La.App. 3d Cir. 1993), the judgment in favor of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company is affirmed, as amended.
AFFIRMED AS AMENDED.
KNOLL, J., concurs for reasons assigned in Ourso v. Grimm.
SAUNDERS, J., dissents for reasons assigned in Ourso v. Grimm.
WOODARD, ^J., concurs for reasons assigned by KNOLL, J., in Ourso v. Grimm.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.