State v. Duncan
Cases that cite this one
120 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.
- State v. Kennedy (La. Ct. App. 2008)
- State v. Lewis (La. Ct. App. 2005)
- State v. Asad (La. Ct. App. 2004)
- State v. Adger (La. Ct. App. 2001)
- State of Louisiana v. Steve Robert Ranney (La. Ct. App. 2021)
- State of Louisiana v. Douglas Scott Holley (La. Ct. App. 2020)
- State v. Jackson (La. Ct. App. 2019)
- State v. Jackson (La. Ct. App. 2019)
- State v. Calhoun (La. Ct. App. 2017)
- State v. Purvis (La. Ct. App. 2017)
- State v. Mays (La. Ct. App. 2017)
- State v. Smith (La. Ct. App. 2016)
- State v. Stringer (La. Ct. App. 2016)
- State v. Davis (La. Ct. App. 2015)
- State v. Miles (La. Ct. App. 2014)
- State v. Dennis (La. Ct. App. 2013)
- State v. Taylor (La. Ct. App. 2012)
- State v. Jackson (La. Ct. App. 2012)
- State v. Thomas (La. Ct. App. 2012)
- State v. Blanche (La. Ct. App. 2012)
- State v. Henderson (La. Ct. App. 2011)
- State v. Boyd (La. Ct. App. 2011)
- State v. NELAMS (La. Ct. App. 2010)
- State v. Kelly (La. Ct. App. 2010)
- State v. Ashley (La. Ct. App. 2009)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
STATE of Louisiana, Appellee,
v.
Sunny Mann DUNCAN, Appellant.
Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit.
*165 Sunny Mann Duncan, in proper person.
Richard Ieyoub, Attorney General, Don M. Burkett, District Attorney, H. Melissa Sugar, Assistant District Attorney, for Appellee.
Before MARVIN, C.J., and WILLIAMS and PEATROSS, JJ.
MARVIN, Chief Judge.
In this out-of-time appeal of a sentence of three years at hard labor by this 40-year-old defendant who did not file the La.C.Cr.P. art. 881.1 motion to reconsider in the trial court, we review the bare claim that the sentence is constitutionally excessive. State v. Mims, 619 So.2d 1059 (La. 1993); State v. Sepulvado, 367 So.2d 762 (La. 1979).
Having reviewed the appellate record, we note that the sentence is neither illegal, nor shocking to our conscience, or needless and purposeless. We find the sentence is not constitutionally excessive for this defendant who, being charged with distribution, bargained to plead guilty to possession, of cocaine.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.