Baker v. Verret
Baker v. Verret
Opinion of the Court
For the reasons discussed in the consolidated case of Glod v. Baker, 04-1488 (La. App. 3 Cir. 3/23/05), 899 So.2d 642, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Costs of the appeal are assessed to appellants, BCM, L.L.C. and Nawlins Kajun Foods, L.L.C.
AFFIRMED.
PETERS, J., Dissents and Assigns Written Reasons.
AMY, J., Concurs for the Reasons Assigned in Glod v. Baker, 04-1483 (La.App. 3 Cir. 3/23/05), 899 So.2d 642.
Dissenting Opinion
dissenting.
For the reasons discussed in my dissent in the consolidated case of Glod v. Baker, 04-1483 (La.App. 3 Cir. 3/23/05), 899 So.2d 642, I respectfully disagree with the majority’s opinion in this matter. I would reverse the trial court’s grant of the summary judgment and remand the matter for further proceedings.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.