Taylor v. Clement
Taylor v. Clement
Opinion of the Court
hFor the reasons expressed in the consolidated case of Susan Arrington v. ER
AFFIRMED. MOTION FOR EN BANC HEARING DENIED.
THIBODEAUX, Chief Judge, specially concurs.
Concurring Opinion
specially concurring.
|,I still maintain my position that the medical malpractice cap is unconstitutional on the bases of equal protection, due process, and separation of powers. However, I must sacrifice my intellectual independence and judicial beliefs to what is the clear pronouncement of the Louisiana Supreme Court in Oliver v. Magnolia Clinic, 11-2132 (La.3/13/12), 85 So.3d 39.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.