Shillem Mack v. Colfax Treating Co, LLC
Opinion
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT
17-912 consolidated with 17-913
SHILLEM MACK, ET AL.
VERSUS COLFAX TREATING CO, LLC, ET AL.
**********
APPEAL FROM THE
NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT
PARISH OF RAPIDES, NO. 236,112 C/W 236,116
HONORABLE WILLIAM GREGORY BEARD, DISTRICT JUDGE
**********
SHANNON J. GREMILLION
JUDGE
**********
Court composed of Marc T. Amy, Shannon J. Gremillion, and Candyce G. Perret, Judges.
MOTION TO STRIKE GRANTED. MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT THE
RECORD DENIED. JUDGMENT AFFIRMED.
Joseph J. Bailey Eli J. Meaux Provosty, Sadler, & deLaunay, APC P. O. Drawer 1791 Alexandria, LA 71309-1791 (318) 445-3631 COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFFS/APPELLANTS:
Virginia Colson Ronald Colson
Daniel E. Broussard, Jr. Broussard, Halcomb & Vizzier P. O. Box 1311 Alexandria, LA 71301 (318) 487-4589 COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFFS/APPELLANTS:
Virginia Colson Ronald Colson
Randall B. Keiser David E. Boraks Keiser Law Firm, P.L.C.
P. O. Box 12358 Alexandria, LA 71315 (318) 443-6168 COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT/APPELLEE:
City of Pineville GREMILLION, Judge.
For the reasons set forth in Colson v. City of Pineville, 17-913 (La.App. 3 Cir. __/__/__), ___ So.3d ___, motion to strike Appellants’ reply brief filed by the City of Pineville is granted. The motion to supplement the record filed by Appellants is denied. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. All Costs of this appeal, in the amount of $1,997.50, are taxed as costs to the City of Pineville.
MOTION TO STRIKE GRANTED. MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT THE RECORD DENIED. JUDGMENT AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.