Sasha Ricketson, Tina Ramus v. Anita McKenzie
Sasha Ricketson, Tina Ramus v. Anita McKenzie
Opinion
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT SASHA RICKETSON, TINA RAMUS, ON NO. 2019 CW 1013 BEHALF OF MADISON RICKETSON AND XANDER RAMUS, AND DANIELL BERRY ON BEHALF OF DYLAN BERRY, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF STEPHEN RICKETSON
VERSUS
ANITA MCKENZIE, ROBERT D.
FRANK, ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY, STATE OF LOUISIANA THROUGH DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND DEVELOPMENT, PARISH OF TANGIPAHOA, TOWN OF AMITE CITY CONSOLIDATED WITH
SASHA RICKETSON, TINA RAMUS, ON NO. 2019 CW 1015 BEHALF OF MADISON RICKETSON AND XANDER RAMUS, AND DANIELL BERRY ON BEHALF OF DYLAN BERRY, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF STEPHEN RICKETSON VERSUS
ANITA MCKENZIE, ROBERT D.
FRANK, ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY, STATE OF LOUISIANA THROUGH DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND DEVELOPMENT, DEC 0 9 2019 PARISH OF TANGIPAHOA, TOWN OF AMITE CITY
In Re: Anita McKenzie, Robert D. Frank, Illinois Central Railroad Company; Town of Amite City, applying for supervisory writs, 21st Judicial District Court, Parish of Tangipahoa, No. 2016- 0001308.
BEFORE: WELCH, HIGGINBOTHAM, AND HOLDRIDGE, JJ.
WRIT DENIED.
JEW TMH GH
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
4 L; DEPUTY C E K OF COURT FOR THE COURT
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.