State Of Louisiana v. Rashan Williams

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

STATE OF LOUISIANA NO. 2020 KW 0930 VERSUS RASHAN WILLIAMS NOVEMBER 10, 2020 In Re: Rashan Williams, applying for supervisory writs, 22nd

Judicial District Court, Parish of Washington, No. 98- CR5- 73282.

BEFORE: GUIDRY, MCCLENDON, AND LANIER, JJ.

WRIT DENIED. In Ramos v. Louisiana, _ U. S._, r 1390, 1397, 206 L. Ed. 2d 583 ( 2020), the United States

S. Ct. Supreme Court held, " the Sixth Amendment' s unanimity requirement

However, applies to state and federal criminal trials equally." the Court declined to address whether its holding applied to cases on collateral review. The Court retroactively the question of "[ w] hether the right specifically observed that to cases on collateral review is a to jury unanimity applies question for a future case where the parties will have a chance to brief the issue and we will benefit from their adversarial presentation." See Ramos, U. S. at . 1140 S. Ct. at 1407. The question of whether Ramos must apply retroactively to cases on federal collateral review is currently pending before the

Edwards U. S. —, 140 S. Ct. 2737, 206 Court. v. Vannoy, _ L. Ed. 2d 917 ( 2020). Moreover, the Louisiana Supreme Court has declined to whether Ramos should apply on definitively rule on collateral review in state court proceedings pending a decision in Edwards. See State v. Gipson, 2019- 01815 ( La. 6/ 3/ 20), 296 So. 3d 1051, 1052 ( Johnson, C. J., dissenting to point out that she disagreed with the majority' s decision to defer ruling until the United States Supreme Court mandates action). Therefore, we this time. However, our are constrained to deny relief at decision does not preclude relator from reurging the issue in the district court if warranted by the decision of the higher court( s).

JMG PMC WIL

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT 5DEPUTY FOR

G RK

THE

OF COURT

COURT