STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT OFFICER JARED NEYLAND NO. 2020 CW 0769 VERSUS

NATIONAL TRUST INSURANCE OCTOBER 26, 2020 COMPANY, STEPHEN CORTS, AND ARCHITECTURAL GLASS & METAL, INC.

Tn Re: Seal Tractor Company, Inc., applying for supervisory writs, 19th Judicial District Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge, No. 677794.

BEFORE: HIGGINBOTHAM, THERIOT, AND WOLFE, JJ.

WRIT GRANTED. The violation of a statute or regulation does not, in and of itself, impose civil liability. Faucheaux v. Terrehonne Consolidated Government, 615 Sc. 2d 289, 292 ( La. 1993). Rather, civil responsibility is imposed only if the violation of the statute or regulation is a legal cause of damage to another, which requires, among other things, a showing that the defendant' s conduct is a cause - in -fact of the accident and resultant injuries. Id. at 292- 93. Regardless of whether any statute or ordinance required Seal Tractor Company, Inc. Seal") to obtain a permit and/ or have additional insignia on its vehicles to show that they formed part of a convoy that included oversized equipment, a reasonable juror, based on the undisputed facts, could not conclude that Seal' s actions. were a cause - in -fact of the accident. See Miller v. Shelter Ins. Co'., 2018- 216 ( La. App. 3rd Cir. 1/ 30/ 19), 266 So. 3d 347, 353 quoting Daigrepont v. AAA Transp. Co., 98- 1329 ( La. App. 3rd Cir. 3/ 3/ 99), 736 So - 2d 923, 927 ( The cause - in -fact inquiry " may be disposed of by summary judgment when no reasonable minds could differ regarding the uncontested facts" and a party' s action could not reasonably be the cause - in -fact of the harm.") Specifically, the undisputed facts show that Stephen Corts saw two oversized tractors being operated by Craig Neal and Sons, LLC (" CNS") in the roadway before he proceeded to attempt his left turn in front of them. Following the two CNS tractors and truck in the convoy were Seal' s two tractors and a pickup truck.

Mr. Corts acknowledged that he could not see of Seal' s any vehicles prior to attempting to make his turn. Considering the foregoing, the mere fact that the Seal vehicles did not have additional markings to signify that they included oversized equipment and/ or formed part of a convoy is not a cause - in -fact of the underlying accident.

Accordingly, we hereby grant the writ application and reverse the trial court' s August 4, 2020 judgment denying the motion for summary judgment filed by Seal.

We render summary judgment in favor Seal Tractor of Company, Inc. and dismiss all parties' claims against Seal Tractor Company, Inc. with prejudice.

TMH MRT EW

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

k aL 21k .DEPUTY CL RK OF COURT FOR THE COURT