Jane Doe, Individually and John Doe, Individually and as Natural Tutor for the Minor Child, J.D. v. Walt Disney Parks and Resorts US, Inc., Walt Disney Travel Co., Inc., Wicker, Smith, O'Hara, McCoy & Ford, P.A., Jones Walker, LLP, and Steven D. Felix
Jane Doe, Individually and John Doe, Individually and as Natural Tutor for the Minor Child, J.D. v. Walt Disney Parks and Resorts US, Inc., Walt Disney Travel Co., Inc., Wicker, Smith, O'Hara, McCoy & Ford, P.A., Jones Walker, LLP, and Steven D. Felix
Opinion
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT INDIVIDUALLY AND NO. 2020 CW 0727 JANE DOE, JOHN DOE, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NATURAL TUTOR FOR THE MINOR CHILD J. D.
VERSUS
WALT DISNEY PARKS AND RESORT, US, INC., WALT DISNEY TRAVEL CO., INC., SMITH, O' HARA, MCCOY WICKER, OCTOBER 21, 2020 FORD, P. A., JONES WALKER, LLP, AND STEVEN D. FELIX
Steven D. Felix, M. D., applying for supervisory writs, In Re: Court, Parish of East Baton 19th Judicial District Rouge, No. 688984.
HOLDRIDGE, LANIER, AND WOLFE, JJ.
BEFORE: HIGGINBOTHAM, THERIOT,
de novo review, we find the action WRIT GRANTED. After a Nineteenth Judicial District brought against Dr. Felix in the submitted to court is premature as it was filed prior to being medical review panel. La. R. S. and determined by a to the allegations found in the 40: 1231. 8 ( B) ( 1) ( a) ( i) . Looking against Dr. Felix are claims petition, we find the allegations
for lack of consent and dereliction of professional skill during allegations that fall within the Medical treatment, which are 96- 1575 ( La. 10/ 10/ 97), Malpractice Act. Lugenbuhl v. Dowling, See also Wilson v. Landry ex rel., 98- 2365 701 So. 2d 447, 453. 748 So. 2d 655, writ denied sub La. ist Cir. 12/ 28/ 99), App. T. W. 2000- 0260 ( La. 3/ 24/ 00), nom., Wilson ex rel. v. Landry, 40: 1157. 1. Therefore, this writ is 758 So. 2d 155; La. R. S. judgment Dr. Felix' s granted, the July 27, 2020 denying the exception of exception of prematurity is reversed,
Felix, M. D. is sustained, and the prematurity filed by Steven D. filed the Does are dismissed without claims against him by prejudice.
TMH MRT GH WIL
Wolfe, J., dissents and would deny the writ.
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
D UTY C R F COURT FOR THE COURT
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.