Whitney Bank v. Henry Rayford
Whitney Bank v. Henry Rayford
Opinion
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT WHITNEY BANK NO. 2020 CW 0357 VERSUS
HENRY RAYFORD JULY 06, 2020
In Re: Henry Rayford, for applying supervisory writs, 22nd Judicial District Court, Parish of Washington, No. 108044.
BEFORE: MCDONALD, THERIOT, AND CHUTZ, JET.
WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. The writ application fails to comply with Rules 4- 2, 4-- 3, 4- 4, and 4- 5 of the Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal, as it does not include a notice of intent to seek supervisory review; a return date order; an affidavit verifying the allegations of the writ application; a copy of the original petition, responsive documents to Rayford' s Motion to Strike ( if any), the judgment, signed and the court minutes; and a request for expedited consideration as required by Rule 4- 4( B) & ( C).
Supplementation of this writ application and/ or an application for rehearing will not be considered. Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal, Rules 4- 9 and 2- 18. 7. In the event relator seeks to file a new application with this court, it must contain all pertinent documentation and must comply with Rule 2- 12. 2 of the Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal.
Any new application must be filed on or before August 7, 2020, and must contain a copy of this ruling.
JMM MRT WRC
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
r" 4k- DEPUTY CL K OF COURT FOR THE COURT
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.