Ron S. Macaluso v. First Guaranty Bank
Ron S. Macaluso v. First Guaranty Bank
Opinion
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT RON S. MACALUSO NO. 2021 CW 1139
VERSUS
FIRST GUARANTY
CONSOLIDATED WITH
FIRST GUARANTY BANK
VERSUS
UNIVERSITY PLACE, L. L. C., CROWE INVESTMENTS, L. L. C., DECEMBER 20, 2021 CHEVY' S ON THE AVENUE, L. L. C., GORDON M. CROWE, JR. AND RON S. MACALUSO
In Re: First Guaranty Bank, applying for supervisory writs, 21st Judicial District Court, Parish of Tangipahoa, Nos. 2010- 000157 c/ w 2011- 000201.
BEFORE: WELCH, THERIOT, AND HESTER, JJ.
WRIT GRANTED WITH ORDER. The portion of the trial court` s
July 26, 2021 judgment, which denied in part the Motion for Partial Summary Judgment filed by the plaintiff, First Guaranty Bank, is vacated. The plaintiff raised objections to the evidence submitted by the defendant, Ron S. Macaluso. However, the trial court failed to rule on the admissibility of all such evidence. La. Code Civ. P. art. 966( D)( 2) provides that the court shall specifically state on the record or in writing which documents, if any, it held to be inadmissible or declined to consider. This matter is remanded to the trial court for compliance with La. Code Civ. P. art. 966( D)( 2), and a ruling on the motion for partial summary judgment filed by the plaintiff after determination of any evidentiary issues, pursuant to La. Code Civ. P. art. 966( C) ( b) ( 4) .
JEW MRT CHH
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
l
DEPUTY CL RK OF COURT FOR THE COURT
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.