State Of Louisiana v. Cedric Emerson
State Of Louisiana v. Cedric Emerson
Opinion
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA NO. 2021 KW 1100 VERSUS
CEDRIC EMERSON NOVEMBER 5, 2021
In Re: Cedric Emerson, applying for supervisory writs, 23rd Judicial District Court, Parish of Ascension, No. 38, 852.
BEFORE: WHIPPLE, C. J., PENZATO AND HESTER, JJ.
WRIT GRANTED. The district court previously referred relator' s pro se motions to defense counsel pursuant to State v. Thibodeaux, 2017- 0705 ( La. 12/ 6/ 17), 236 So. 3d 1253 ( per curiam). Thus, the matter is now remanded to the district court to conduct a contradictory hearing. As it appears defense counsel has failed to respond to the court' s orders, a date should be set for counsel to file a response. If defense counsel refuses to adopt relator' s motions, then during the hearing, the court should evaluate the disruptive potential of the motions in light of State v. Melon, 95- 2209 ( La. 9/ 22/ 95), 660 So. 2d 466, before determining whether to conduct a hearing consistent with State v. Alexander, 2007- 1236 ( La. App. 3d Cir. 4/ 9/ 08), 980 So. 2d 877, as set forth in Thibodeaux.
VGW AHP CHH
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
j 1R# 001 , 14 1 T)EPUTYRLERK OF COURT FOR THE COURT
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.