State Of Louisiana v. Andrew Wetzel
State Of Louisiana v. Andrew Wetzel
Opinion
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA NO. 2021 KW 0314 VERSUS
ANDREW D. WETZEL MAY 10, 2021
In Re: Andrew D. Wetzel, applying for supervisory writs, 22nd Judicial District Court, Parish of St. Tammany, No. 472, 552.
BEFORE: MCDONALD, HOLDRIDGE, AND LANIER, JJ.
WRIT DENIED. The record of the St. Tammany Parish Clerk' s Office does not support relator' s allegation that the district court granted habeas relief regarding his request to lift the parole hold. Furthermore, the decision in Ramos v. Louisiana, U. S. , 140 S. Ct. 1390, 1397, 206 L. Ed. 2d 583 ( 2020), does not apply retroactively; and thus, relator' s sentence is not illegal. See La. Const. art. I, § 17; La. Code Crim. P. art. 782. See also State v. Copeland, 52, 742 ( La. App. 2d Cir. 9/ 25/ 19), 280 So. 3d 848, 867 ( Copeland' s offense was committed on September 15, 2016, well before January 2019, so the unanimous jury verdict law does not apply.) Therefore, the district court did not err by denying the Motion to Declare La. Code Crim. P. art. 782( A) Unconstitutional or by denying the Motion to Correct an Illegal Sentence.
Jm GH WIL
COURT OF/ APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT FOR THE COURT
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.