Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2021

Iberville Parish v. City of Baton Rouge/Parish of East Baton Rouge

Iberville Parish v. City of Baton Rouge/Parish of East Baton Rouge
Louisiana Court of Appeal · Decided April 21, 2021

Iberville Parish v. City of Baton Rouge/Parish of East Baton Rouge

Opinion

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT IBERVILLE PARISH NO. 2020 CW 1231 VERSUS

CITY OF BATON ROUGE/ PARISH APRIL 21, 2021 OF EAST BATON ROUGE

In Re: City of Baton Rouge/ Parish of East Baton Rouge, applying for supervisory writs, 18th Judicial District Court, Parish of Iberville, No. 80144.

BEFORE: MCDONALD, HOLDRIDGE, AND PENZATO, JJ.

WRIT GRANTED WITH ORDER. The portion of the trial court' s November 18, 2020 judgment denying the declinatory exception of improper venue filed by defendant, the Baton City of Rouge/ Parish of East Baton Rouge, is reversed. All suits filed against a political subdivision of the state shall be instituted before the district court of the judicial district in which the political subdivision is located or in the district court having jurisdiction in the parish in which the cause of action arises.

La. R. S. 13: 5104( B). The parish where the operative facts occurred that support the plaintiff' s entitlement to recovery is where the cause of action arises. Impastato v. State, Div. of Admin., 2010- 1998 ( La. 11/ 19/ 10), 50 So. 3d 1277 ( per curiam). In this case, plaintiff alleges actions of the defendant, the City of Baton Rouge/ Parish of East Baton Rouge, created flooding issues in the Parish of Iberville. Any actions of the City of Baton Rouge/ Parish of East Baton Rouge in necessarily occurred the Parish of East Baton Rouge; and the accordingly, parish of proper venue pursuant to La. R. S. 13: 5104( B) is the Parish cf East Baton Rouge. Therefore, the defendant' s exception of improper venue is granted, and this matter is remanded to the trial court with instructions to transfer this action to East Baton Rouge Parish. In addition, the portions of the trial court' s November 18, 2020 judgment that denied the exceptions of no cause of action, no right of action, prescription and vagueness are vacated, to be addressed by a court of proper venue following transfer.

JMM GH AHP

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

DEPUTY CLER OF COURT FOR THE COURT

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.