Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2021

State Of Louisiana v. Christopher Gage

State Of Louisiana v. Christopher Gage
Louisiana Court of Appeal · Decided February 1, 2021

State Of Louisiana v. Christopher Gage

Opinion

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA NO. 2020 KW 1272 VERSUS

CHRISTOPHER GAGE FEBRUARY 1, 2021

In Re: Christopher Gage, applying for supervisory writs, 32nd Judicial District Court, Parish of Terrebonne, No. 303, 250.

BEFORE: THERIOT, WOLFE, AND HESTER, JJ.

WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. The instant writ application appears to be untimely as counsel failed to include documentation of a timely request for a return date, and the Order is not signed by the respondent judge. See Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal, Rules 4- 2, 4- 3, and 4- 5( C)( 11). The affidavit of verification does not contain the respondent judge' s address and phone number.

Relator also failed to comply with Rule 4- 5( C)( 9) and ( 10), by failing to include a copy of any opposition or a statement that no opposition was filed and the pertinent court minutes. Moreover, although it is not a violation of the Uniform Rules, note that counsel failed to we include a copy of the relevant portions of relator' s trial transcript a showing request for jury polling was made. See City of Baton Rouge v. Plain, 433 So. 2d 710 ( La.), cert. denied, 464 U. S. 896, 104 S. Ct. 246, 78 L. Ed. 2d 235 ( 1983). Supplementation of this writ application and/ or an application for rehearing will not be considered. See Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal, Rules 2- 18. 7 & 4- 9. In the event counsel elects to file a new application with this court, he may do so without the necessity of obtaining a return date. The application shall be filed on or before March 4, 2021, and must include the missing items noted above and a copy of this ruling.

MRT EW CHH

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

DEPUTY LERK OF COURT FOR THE COURT

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.