Judgment rendered April 27, 2022.

No. 54,161-CA ON REHEARING COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA

*****

FEDERAL INSURANCE Plaintiffs-Appellees COMPANY, COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY INSURANCE COMPANY, LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY, EXCO OPERATING COMPANY, LP AND EXCO RESOURCES, INC. versus SELECT ENERGY SERVICES, Defendants-Appellants LLC, SES HOLDINGS, LLC, ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, AMERICAN GUARANTEE AND LIABILITY INSURANCE COMPNAY AND EVANSTON INSURANCE COMPANY ***** Per Curiam on Rehearing Originally Appealed from the Forty-Second Judicial District Court for the Parish of DeSoto, Louisiana Trial Court No. 77378 Honorable Eric R. Harrington, Judge (Pro Tempore) ***** GAUDRY, RANSON, HIGGINS & Counsel for Appellants, GREMILLION, L.L.C. Select Energy Services, By: Michael D. Peytavin LLC and SES Holdings, LLC BRINEY FORET CORRY, LLP Counsel for Appellants, By: Charles J. Foret Zurich American Jason Roy Garrot Insurance Company and American Guarantee & Liability Insurance Company FRILOT, LLC Counsel for Appellant, By: Danica Benbow Denny Alterra American Kathleen Pontier Rice Insurance Company Patrick J. McShane GIEGER, LABORDE & LAPEROUSE, LLC Counsel for Appellees, By: Robert Irwin Siegel Federal Insurance Jameson Michael Taylor Company, Commerce & Industry Insurance Company, and Lexington Insurance Company ADAMS AND REESE, LLP Counsel for Appellees, By: Martin A. Stern Federal Insurance Raymond Peter Ward Company, Commerce & Industry Insurance Company, and Lexington Insurance Company BARRASSO, USDIN, KUPPERMAN, Counsel for Appellees, FREEMAN & SARVER, LLC EXCO Operating By: Steven William Usdin Company, LP & EXCO Stephen R. Klaffky Resources, Inc.

***** Before MOORE, PITMAN, STONE, STEPHENS, and ROBINSON, JJ.

Per Curiam We granted rehearing solely for the purpose of correcting an error in stating that Select’s insurers paid $31 million in settlement of the Paredes lawsuit. Select’s insurers actually settled that case for $1 million. Our error was the result of transposing the settlement amounts in the Paredes lawsuit and the Rodgers lawsuit. Our original opinion is hereby affirmed, and is corrected as stated herein.