State Of Louisiana v. Kyle J. Anderson
State Of Louisiana v. Kyle J. Anderson
Opinion
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA NO. 2021 KW 1554 VERSUS
KYLE JEROME ANDERSON FEBRUARY 14, 2022
In Re: Kyle Jerome Anderson, applying for supervisory writs, 22nd Judicial District Court, Parish of St. Tammany, No. 593, 531.
BEFORE: MCCLENDON, WELCH, AND THERIOT, JJ.
WRIT DENIED. When a defendant enters a counseled plea of an guilty, appellate court will review the quality of counsel' s representation in deciding whether the plea should be set aside.
See State v. West, 2009- 2810 ( La. 12/ 10/ 10), 50 So. 3d 148, 149 per curiam). A review of the transcripts and documents attached to the writ application reveals that relator failed to establish ( 1) that counsel' s performance fell below an objective standard of reasonableness under prevailing professional norms or ( 2) that counsel' s inadequate performance prejudiced relator to the extent that the proceedings were rendered unfair and the convictions suspect. See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U. S. 668, 104 S. Ct. 2052, 80 L. Ed. 2d 674 ( 1984). The documents further refute the claims that relator was confused as to the terms of the plea and sentencing agreement and that the court improperly participated in the plea negotiations. Accordingly, the district court did not err by denying the application for postconviction relief.
PMc JEW MRT
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
DEPUTY L RK OF COURT FOR THE COURT
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.