State Of Louisiana v. Roydall Lumar
State Of Louisiana v. Roydall Lumar
Opinion
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
STATE OF LOUISIANA NO. 2022 KW 0833 VERSUS ROYDALL LUMAR OCTOBER 24, 2022 In Re: Roydall Lumar, applying for supervisory writs, Ascension Parish Court, Parish of Ascension, No. 607,841.
BEFORE : McDONALD, McCLENDON, AND HOLDRIDGE, JJ.
WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. Relator failed to comply with the Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal, Rule 4-5(A), by failing to include a notarized affidavit verifying the allegations of the application and certifying that a copy has been delivered or mailed to the respondent judge and opposing counsel that includes their respective addresses and telephone numbers. The writ application does not comply with Rule 4-5(B) as it is not properly bound. Relator also failed to comply with Rule 4-5(C) (1), (8), (9) and (11), by failing to include an Index, a copy of the misdemeanor bill of information, a copy of the opposition, if any, and the return date order. Moreover, although it is not a violation of the Uniform Rules, relator failed to include a copy of the bench trial transcript and a copy of any exhibits introduced at trial, which we find necessary to adequately review the parish court’s judgment. La. Code Crim. P. art. 912.1(C) (1); City of Baton Rouge v. Plain, 433 So.2d 710 (La.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 896, 104 S.Ct. 246, 78 L.Ed.2d 235 (1983). Supplementation of this writ application and/or an application for rehearing will not be considered. See Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal, Rules 2-18.7 & 4-9.
Any future filing on the issues raised herein should include the entire contents of this application, the missing items noted above, and a copy of this ruling.
JMM PMc GH COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT Ac) DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT FOR THE COURT
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.