Martiza Rubio v. Allstate Insurance, State Farm Automobile Insurance Company, Sylvia M. Champagne, and Justine P. Armstrong
Martiza Rubio v. Allstate Insurance, State Farm Automobile Insurance Company, Sylvia M. Champagne, and Justine P. Armstrong
Opinion
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT MARITZA RUBIO NO. 2022 CW 0910 VERSUS ALLSTATE INSURANCE; STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY; SYLVIA M. CHAMPAGNE; JUSTINE P. ARMSTRONG CONSOLIDATED WITH
OLGA MEJIA VERSUS ALLSTATE INSURANCE; STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY; SYLVIA M. CHAMPAGNE; JUSTINE P. ARMSTRONG CONSOLIDATED WITH
LISSETTE MENENDEZ VERSUS STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL CONSOLIDATED WITH
JUSTINE P. ARMSTRONG VERSUS ‘NOVEMBER 21, 2022 SYLVIA M. CHAMPAGNE & STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
In Re: Sylvia M. Champagne and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, applying for supervisory writs, 23rd Judicial District Court, Parish of Ascension, No. 130652 c/w 130654 c/w 130607 c/w 126046.
BEFORE : THERIOT, CHUTZ, AND HESTER, Ju.
WRIT GRANTED IN PART; DENIED IN PART. The writ application is granted for the sole purpose of striking the portion of the district court’s June 27, 2022 judgment that reads “because the sudden emergency doctrine does not apply in this matter.” This writ application is denied in all other respects.
MRT WRC CHH COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT An) DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT FOR THE COURT
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.