A r a

r, " • aa a r . . •

t s I! M, x.

TEXAS BRINE COMPANY, LLC

µ d4 3udgment Rendered - MAY 19

2023 ON EL FROM THE 23RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT CURT, DIVISION ASSUMPTION PARISH, LOUISIANA DOCKET NUMBER

4, Leopold Z. Louisana a

Sher James M. a::! i

Garner Peter L.

Hilbert, Jr. Christopher aa ..; T.

a New Orleans.,

r Travis J.

Turner Gonzales,

Louisana

a Roy ' a et

ai Kent A.

Lambert Adam B.

Zuckerman AdamsMat hew C.

Juneau Lauren Brink New Orleans., Letm This dispute is one of many arising out of the August 3, 2012 sinkhole that

I lIill I I I I I WSTIZM- 1 111 I I I M I III 1: 1121 p RUE I I

Mill 111111111, 1` 1

to the trial court.

by the same trial court, on the same day, but in a different docket number, i.e., Twenty - 1111111: I P1111111 I" FIRINIRII: ' 1 1 1 1, 1111; 111112 11 C'lglp 0

Is! 1311111. laiIiiiiiiiii Irn 1 ; Illirll

Ill ; III " I IIIIll I1111111 1111HEI HIM ! 71111Ili I 0511 fl if ! IRII - I- . I' I- 0.

481n.[MZ3 111pi riligrllpIlilill M w= Kmzila litf!41 1 S

appealable judgment under La. C. C. P. art. 1915( B) and R.J. Messinger, Inc. v.

I In

After a thorough review of the record, we find no material distinction between the I 1111111 1 I I I I I I I 1111 p I I Ilip I I p Ili I I

art. 1915( B) and Messinger Therefore, we lack subject matter jurisdiction over this

I After Crosstex 0832 was decided, this court decided Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC v. Texas Brine Company, LLC, 22- 1036 ( La. App. 1 Cir. 4/ 18/ 23), 5o. 3d , 2023 WL 2985097 ( Florida Gas 1036), and again considered another identical judgment by the same trial court, on the same day, in a third trial court docket number, i.e., Twenty -Third JDC Docket No. 34, 316. As did the CrosstexO832Court before it, the Florida Gas 1036 Court dismissed Texas Brine's appeal.

proceedings. We issue this summary disposition in accordance with Uniform Rules —

j- jq, 11 1171 FIT! k ii I 51, 1171F 0 0

2 In light of this opinion and the parties' appearance at oral argument, we deny as moot Texas Brine' s February 8, 2023 Motion to Remand Issues Presented by this Appeal and Cancel Oral Argument Due to Improvident Granting of Article 1915( B) Certification, that was filed with this Court.