SHEDRICK GIVENS NO. 24-KH-384 VERSUS FIFTH CIRCUIT TIM HOOPER, WARDEN COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF LOUISIANA

August 22, 2024 Linda Wiseman First Deputy Clerk

IN RE SHEDRICK GIVENS APPLYING FOR SUPERVISORY WRIT FROM THE TWENTY-FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF LOUISIANA, DIRECTED TO THE HONORABLE R. CHRISTOPHER COX, III, DIVISION "B", NUMBER 95-2188

Panel composed of Judges Jude G. Gravois, John J. Molaison, Jr., and Timothy S. Marcel

WRIT DENIED In June of 1996, the relator was found guilty of second-degree murder by a jury. He was thereafter sentenced to life imprisonment at hard labor without benefit of parole, probation, or suspension of sentence. On appeal, this Court affirmed relator’s conviction and sentence, and the Louisiana Supreme Court denied his writ application. State v. Givens, 97-17 (La. App. 5 Cir. 10/15/97), 701 So.2d 1042, writ denied, 97-2893 (La. 3/27/98), 716 So.2d 884. Since that time, the relator filed numerous applications for post-conviction relief (“APCR”), and the Louisiana Supreme Court ruled in 2018 that the relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. State ex rel. Givens v. State, 17-0238 (La. 4/20/18), 240 So.3d 916.

In the relator’s most recent APCR filing, he asserted that the district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over his criminal trial on the grounds of double jeopardy and the absence of a grand jury indictment. The trial court denied the APCR as being time barred, repetitive, and successive. As to the merits of the claims, the court found that the relator had not carried his burden of proof under La. C.Cr.P. art. 930.2. In the instant writ application, the relator contends that the trial court erred in denying his APCR as time barred, repetitive, successive, and without merit.

As correctly noted by the trial court, the relator originally raised the issue of double jeopardy on appeal and his argument was found to be without merit by both this Court and the Louisiana Supreme Court. Similarly, the relator’s claim about the trial court’s subject matter jurisdiction based on the amendment of charges by the State has also previously been addressed and denied by this Court and the 24-KH-384 supreme court in prior writ applications. See, Givens v. State, 10-103 (La. App. 5 Cir. 2/8/10), writ denied, State ex rel. Givens v. State, 11-1999 (La. 5/4/12), 88 So.3d 460; Givens v. State, 19-605 (La. App. 5 Cir. 1/3/20), unpublished disposition, writ denied, Givens v. State through Att'y Gen.'s Off., 20-268 (La. 10/6/20), 302 So.3d 514. Thus, the claims in the relator’s most recent APCR are repetitive under La. C.Cr.P. art. 930.4. In addition, the application was not timely filed in the district court, and relator fails to carry his burden to show that an exception applies. La. C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; State ex rel. Glover v. State, 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189. On the showing made, the relator’s writ application is denied.

Gretna, Louisiana, this 22nd day of August, 2024.

JJM JGG TSM

SUSAN M. CHEHARDY CURTIS B. PURSELL CHIEF JUDGE CLERK OF COURT

SUSAN S. BUCHHOLZ FREDERICKA H. WICKER CHIEF DEPUTY CLERK JUDE G. GRAVOIS MARC E. JOHNSON STEPHEN J. WINDHORST LINDA M. WISEMAN JOHN J. MOLAISON, JR. FIRST DEPUTY CLERK SCOTT U. SCHLEGEL TIMOTHY S. MARCEL FIFTH CIRCUIT MELISSA C. LEDET JUDGES 101 DERBIGNY STREET (70053) DIRECTOR OF CENTRAL STAFF POST OFFICE BOX 489 GRETNA, LOUISIANA 70054 (504) 376-1400 (504) 376-1498 FAX www.fifthcircuit.org

NOTICE OF DISPOSITION CERTIFICATE OF DELIVERY I CERTIFY THAT A COPY OF THE DISPOSITION IN THE FOREGOING MATTER HAS BEEN TRANSMITTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH UNIFORM RULES - COURT OF APPEAL, RULE 4-6 THIS DAY 08/22/2024 TO THE TRIAL JUDGE, THE TRIAL COURT CLERK OF COURT, AND AT LEAST ONE OF THE COUNSEL OF RECORD FOR EACH PARTY, AND TO EACH PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL, AS LISTED BELOW:

24-KH-384 E-NOTIFIED 24th Judicial District Court (Clerk) R. Christopher Cox, III (DISTRICT JUDGE) Thomas J. Butler (Respondent) MAILED Shedrick Givens #328052 (Relator) Louisiana State Penitentiary Angola, LA 70712