James Ivory, Crystal Lombard Versus Travelers Property and Casualty Company
James Ivory, Crystal Lombard Versus Travelers Property and Casualty Company
Opinion
JAMES IVORY, CRYSTAL LOMBARD, ET AL NO. 24-C-355 VERSUS FIFTH CIRCUIT TRAVELERS PROPERTY AND CASUALTY COURT OF APPEAL COMPANY, ET AL STATE OF LOUISIANA
September 23, 2024 Linda Wiseman First Deputy Clerk
IN RE TRAVELERS PROPERTY AND CASUALTY COMPANY APPLYING FOR SUPERVISORY WRIT FROM THE TWENTY-FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF LOUISIANA, DIRECTED TO THE HONORABLE SHAYNA BEEVERS MORVANT, DIVISION "M", NUMBER 807-692
Panel composed of Judges Marc E. Johnson, Scott U. Schlegel, and Timothy S. Marcel
WRIT DENIED In this case arising from an automobile rear-end collision on July 5, 2019, defendant Travelers Property and Casualty Company seeks supervisory review of a judgment of the trial court granting a partial motion for summary judgment in favor of plaintiffs declaring the insurance policy provided by Travelers to plaintiff James Ivory does provide uninsured / underinsured motorist (“UM/UIM”) coverage.
In its writ application, Travelers argues that summary judgment should not have been granted because there exists a genuine issue of material fact as to whether Mr. Ivory signed a valid form rejecting UM/UIM coverage. Travelers also argues that the trial court erred in its application of Tennessee law on UM/UIM coverage. (It is undisputed by parties that Tennessee law applies to this policy which was issued in Tennessee.)
Appellate courts review summary judgments de novo using the same criteria that govern the trial court’s determination of whether summary judgment is appropriate. In re Succession of O'Krepki, 16-50 (La. App. 5 Cir. 5/26/16, 5), 193 So.3d 574, 577. A motion for summary judgment should be granted if, after an adequate opportunity for discovery, the motion, memorandum, and supporting documents show that there is no genuine issue as to material fact and that the mover is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. La. C.C.P. art. 966(A)(3). A material fact is one that potentially insures or prevents recovery, affects a litigant’s ultimate success, or determines the outcome of the lawsuit. Mealey v. Lopez, 16-77 (La. App. 5 Cir. 5/26/16), 193 So.3d 539, 542. An issue is genuine if it is such that reasonable persons could disagree; if only one conclusion could be reached by 24-C-355 1 reasonable persons, summary judgment is appropriate as there is no need for a trial on the issue. Id. Whether Mr. Ivory signed a valid UM rejection is clearly a material fact; however, under the facts of this case, it is not a genuine one because the policy numbers on the UM rejection forms from 2014 and 2016 attached by Travelers opposition to the motion for summary judgment do not match the number of the policy in effect at the time of the accident in 2019 under which plaintiff seeks coverage. In other words, Travelers has provided no evidence of a UM rejection form (valid or otherwise) applicable to the policy at issue.
Travelers’ argument that such a rejection form is unnecessary in Tennessee is not supported by Tennessee law. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 56-7-1201 (mandating UM coverage for all automobile policies delivered in the state unless rejected in writing by the named insured.)
On de novo review, we agree with the trial court that there is no genuine issue of material fact, and we find no legal error in the trial court’s application of Tennessee law. This writ is denied.
Gretna, Louisiana, this 23rd day of September, 2024.
TSM MEJ SUS
24-C-355 2 SUSAN M. CHEHARDY CURTIS B. PURSELL CHIEF JUDGE CLERK OF COURT
SUSAN S. BUCHHOLZ FREDERICKA H. WICKER CHIEF DEPUTY CLERK JUDE G. GRAVOIS MARC E. JOHNSON STEPHEN J. WINDHORST LINDA M. WISEMAN JOHN J. MOLAISON, JR. FIRST DEPUTY CLERK SCOTT U. SCHLEGEL TIMOTHY S. MARCEL FIFTH CIRCUIT MELISSA C. LEDET JUDGES 101 DERBIGNY STREET (70053) DIRECTOR OF CENTRAL STAFF POST OFFICE BOX 489 GRETNA, LOUISIANA 70054 (504) 376-1400 (504) 376-1498 FAX www.fifthcircuit.org
NOTICE OF DISPOSITION CERTIFICATE OF DELIVERY I CERTIFY THAT A COPY OF THE DISPOSITION IN THE FOREGOING MATTER HAS BEEN TRANSMITTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH UNIFORM RULES - COURT OF APPEAL, RULE 4-6 THIS DAY 09/23/2024 TO THE TRIAL JUDGE, THE TRIAL COURT CLERK OF COURT, AND AT LEAST ONE OF THE COUNSEL OF RECORD FOR EACH PARTY, AND TO EACH PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL, AS LISTED BELOW:
24-C-355 E-NOTIFIED 24th Judicial District Court (Clerk) Honorable Shayna Beevers Morvant (DISTRICT JUDGE) Honorable John E. LeBlanc (DISTRICT JUDGE) Lance E. Harwell (Relator) Thomas J. Eppling (Relator) MAILED David D. Bravo (Respondent) Scott A. Cannon (Respondent) Attorney at Law Attorney at Law 1100 Poydras Street 122 Village Street Suite 2601 Slidell, LA 70458 New Orleans, LA 70163
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.