Amanda Jones v. Citizens For A New Louisiana, Michael Lunsford, and Ryan Thames
Amanda Jones v. Citizens For A New Louisiana, Michael Lunsford, and Ryan Thames
Opinion
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA
RE: Docket Number 2023-CA-0654
Amanda Jones Versus - - 21st Judicial District Court Citizens For A New Louisiana, Michael Lunsford, and Ryan case #: 175021 Thames Livingston Parish
On Application for Rehearing filed on 02/08/2024 by Amanda Jones Rehearing dr:::-tv,•-~ v, ,~ -=--~-------------------------
Pag(/Lt~ Chris Hester
C/lfl'J Steven M. Miller 1 far reo...-, 011 '::. a,-ss-.-,; v\.,~ e,{ ..
S,vt M r, ~ CL-f H
Rodd Naquin, Clerk STATE OF LOUISIANA AMANDA JONES
COURT OF APPEAL VERSUS
FIRST CIRCUIT CITIZENS FOR A NEW LOUISIANA, MICHAEL LUNSFORD, AND RYAN THAMES
DOCKET NUMBER 2023 CA0654
MILLER, J., denies rehearing. Without changing my position as set forth in my dissent, but for the sake ofjudicial economy, I vote to deny rehearing.
STATE OF LOUISIANA
COURT OF APPEAL
FIRST CIRCUIT
2023 CA0654
AMANDA JONES
VERSUS
CITIZENS FOR A NEW LOUISIANA, MICHAEL LUNSFORD, AND RYAN THAMES
Mcclendon, J., dissenting on denial for rehearing.
I would have granted Ms. Jones's application for rehearing for the limited and
sole purpose of clarifying our decision regarding the finality of the trial court's October
11, 2022 judgment, which granted the special motions to strike and dismissed with
prejudice Ms. Jones's claims against the defendants. In said judgment, the court set a
hearing date to determine " an award of reasonable attorney fees pursuant to [ LSA-
C.C. P. art.] 971(8)." As noted in our original opinion, LSA-C.C.P. art. 971(8) directs that
a prevailing party on a special motion to strike shall be awarded reasonable attorney
fees and costs." It is clear from the judgment that the hearing set by the trial court
was merely to set the amount of attorney fees, having already determined that an
award of attorney fees was mandated. Therefore, the only issue remaining, after
rendition of the October 11, 2022 judgment, was the amount of the attorney fees and
costs. Given that the trial court retains jurisdiction to "[ s]et and tax costs ... and
attorney fees" under LSA-C.C.P. art. 2088(A){l0), the October 11, 2022 judgment was
a final judgment for purposes of appeal.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.